What Is the Low Energy Availability?
Problematic Low Energy Availability (LEA) and/or Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S) results when an athlete does not have enough calories to support and maintain normal physiologic functions [1-3]. Being in a LEA state for too long can cause health and performance to decline [2].
LEA can occur due to insufficient energy intake through diet (i.e., too few calories) and/or excessive energy expenditure from exercise (i.e., burning too many calories), and can occur in the absence of negative energy balance or a caloric deficit. An athlete can be in energy balance and still in a state of low energy availability if they are maintaining a body fat level that requires excessively low caloric intake and/or high energy expenditure [4].
Energy availability is expressed as kcal/kg FFM/day, and is defined in the scientific literature in the form of a mathematical formula: EA [Energy Availability] = EI [Dietary energy Intake (kcal)] - EEE [Exercise Energy Expenditure (kcal)] / FFM [Fat-Free Mass (kg) / day]
The risk categories for LEA based on energy availability are as follows: high risk (≤ 30 kcal/kg FFM), moderate risk (30–45 kcal/kg FFM), and no risk (≥ 45 kcal/kg FFM)[1-3, 5, 6]. The prevalence of RED-S in athletes has been reported to be upwards of 45% or more, though additional research is needed [6, 7]. The body fat percentage and energy availability risk thresholds at which females start to see physiologic and hormonal/menstrual cycle disruptions are highly variable (i.e., some females may see disruptions at 25% body fat or greater, and some may not see negative effects until body fat percentages in the high teens) [8-10]. The energy availability threshold where negative impacts from LEA occur is likely significantly lower in males on average (i.e., perhaps ≤ 25 kcal/kg FFM) [11-14]. However, some males may see deleterious effects from LEA at body fat percentages in the mid-teens, and some may not show signs or symptoms even in single-digit body fat percentages [10, 11, 15].
Keywords: Low Energy Availability, Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport, Performance
Associated Biomarkers
Experienced Physiological Effects:
- Increased Fatigue/Low Energy
- Low Mood/Increased Irritability
- Decreased Sex Drive
- GI Symptoms
Physiology Deep Dive:
A plethora of systems can be negatively affected due to a prolonged LEA state. Hormonally, LEA can result in lowered leptin [12, 16-24], reduced IGF-1 [10, 18, 20, 21, 25-31], decreased total + free testosterone and increased sex-hormone binding globulin [10, 13-15, 21, 29, 31-35], and reduced thyroid hormones [14, 20, 21, 23, 27, 28, 31-33, 36, 37]. The immune, hematopoietic (blood cell production), and iron storage systems can also be negatively affected by LEA, with lowered white blood cells, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and ferritin [13, 14, 25, 35, 38, 39]. Lowered bone mineral density and increased risk of stress fracture are also possible with long-term LEA [20, 28, 30, 40-44]. Metabolically, lowered insulin, triglycerides, and c-peptide are indicative of insufficient energy availability [12, 15, 20, 30, 33, 36, 45, 46]. LEA states are also associated with decreases in sport availability (i.e., missed practices & games), recovery, adaptations to training, endurance, strength, power, and even motivation [2].
Constraint Zones:
Green:
A green score means that the athlete is unlikely to be in a state of problematic LEA. Depending on the goals of the athlete, an energy deficit, maintenance, or surplus strategy could be utilized.
Yellow:
Problematic LEA is potentially occurring. The athlete should carefully measure their energy availability and complete the LEAF-Q or LEAM-Q. Performance should be monitored and, depending on the circumstances as well as the near and long-term goals of the athlete, an increase in kcals and/or a decrease in energy expenditure may be warranted. An increase in carbohydrate availability may also be considered.
Orange:
Problematic LEA is likely. The individual should carefully measure their energy availability and complete the LEAF-Q or LEAM-Q. Performance should be monitored and, depending on the circumstances as well as the near and long-term goals of the athlete, an increase in kcals and/or a decrease in energy expenditure may be warranted. An increase in carbohydrate availability may also be considered.
Red:
Problematic LEA is evident. The athlete should carefully measure their energy availability and complete the LEAF-Q or LEAM-Q. An increase in kcals and/or a decrease in energy expenditure is likely appropriate. Body fat may need to be gained to allow for sufficient/optimal long-term energy availability [4, 8]. Consulting an experienced registered dietitian or medical provider may be warranted.
